Category Archives: Inadimssability
I-601 vs. I-601A Waivers: Provisional Waiver Strategy for Consular Processing
What is the Difference Between I-601 and I-601A? Families confronting unlawful presence problems often hear the words “waiver” and “provisional waiver” used almost interchangeably. In practice, however, Form I-601 and Form I-601A serve different purposes, apply at different stages of the process, and require different strategic planning. Choosing the wrong approach, or misunderstanding the… Read More »
Crimes Involving Moral Turpitude: The Categorical Approach in Immigration Law
Why CIMT Analysis Is So Important Few areas of immigration law create as much confusion as crimes involving moral turpitude, commonly called CIMTs. The phrase sounds moralistic and old-fashioned, and in many ways it is. Yet it remains deeply consequential in modern immigration practice. A CIMT finding can affect admissibility, deportability, eligibility for relief,… Read More »
Waivers for Prior Misrepresentation in Family-Based Immigration
Few findings in immigration law carry consequences as severe as a determination of fraud or willful misrepresentation. Under INA § 212(a)(6)(C)(i), a foreign national who, by fraud or willful misrepresentation of a material fact, seeks to procure a visa, admission, or other immigration benefit is inadmissible. Unlike many other grounds of inadmissibility, this bar… Read More »
Public Charge Rule Updates and Marriage-Based Applications in 2026
Few aspects of the marriage-based green card process generate more confusion than the public charge ground of inadmissibility. Over the past several years, regulatory shifts, litigation, and agency reinterpretations have reshaped how U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services evaluates financial sponsorship. As we move through 2026, applicants and petitioners must understand how current policy affects… Read More »